Right of the Court of Law-A dscussion

This Blog is in continuation of the Blog Dt 26th/27th of July2013 relating to " Day & Night Agitaion on Solar scam" One of the top leaders of the Agitating section had mentioned that the Trial Court has no right to Declare an Advocate appointed by an accused as Disqualified.it seems the remark of the leader is to some extent valid & logical. But unfortunately for the leader& fortunately for the Court of Law,the Judge has just prevented the advocate from taking Statement from the accused in the jail & not disqualified him. Apart from this,the Judge had valid reasons to make such an order as there had been numerous lies spread in the Media according to the Judge.The judge had made it more clearer by stating that the Trial court has right only to Record secret confession from an accused to the acceptance of a crime committed by him/ But according to the Judge the reports spread in the media were lies& had no relevance to the case in court. It is because of this & particularly in view of the fact that the accused was educated& capable of writing a petition to the court herself.it is due to this the Judge prevented the advocate from writing petition on behalf of The accused & not in any manner DISQUALIFIED the Advocate. The decision of the judge is within his right & not the way in which the agitating leader imagined SreedharanMundanat 28th July2013 20-42(IST)